Gay Marriage Ban Protesters, Police Clash in California Streets

There’s a whole lot of peace going on here!

From FRC.com:

Not everyone was as jubilant about the gains for marriage as FRC and our supporters. This morning, FOX News posted photo after photo of the anti-family rioting in Los Angeles (where a majority of voters actually voted “yes” on Proposition 8), Hollywood, Santa Monica, and San Francisco. Hundreds of protestors spilled out into the street last night, blocking traffic, and, in one incident, climbing atop a police car. “…[A]bout 500 [demonstrators] gathered near CNN’s Los Angeles bureau, where they were seen banging on the doors and walls, causing the [L.A.] police Department to declare a tactical alert. …Several others were arrested…” With nearly all of the votes counted, Proposition 8 leads by more than a half million votes (52.5% to 47.5%). Even though there are an estimated three million mail and provisional ballots, none of the local officials expect the outcome to change. Members of the “No on 8″ campaign are shocked and distressed, but San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom (who famously declared that “gay marriage is here whether you like it or not!”) said he is “hopeful” the courts will overturn the people’s will. To that effect, three separate lawsuits have been filed in California courts, all challenging the validity of Proposition 8. Once again, homosexual extremists are turning to their place of preference for creating public policy-the courts. The nation’s voice has long been a casualty of this powerful alliance between judicial activists and the radical Left. For years, liberals have used the courts to impose their agenda on Americans when the people or legislature refused.

On this issue, however, democracy has spoken. From every corner of California, Florida, and Arizona, voters proved that marriage crosses demographic lines-even party lines, in some cases. The attachment to marriage and its meaning is deeply rooted in the African-American, Latino, Asian, and white communities. And exit polling proved it. In the Golden State, where Newsom is trying to invalidate voters’ decision on marriage, Proposition 8 proved to be a moral mandate from every race, every sex, and all income levels. Although minorities overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama, seven in 10 black voters and 53% of Hispanics propelled Proposition 8 to victory. Men and women were equally supportive, as were people aged 35 and above. Nor did it matter what the household income was. In a survey of 2,240 voters, the richest and poorest of California were separated in their support for marriage by only one percentage point!

The same trends continue in Arizona on Proposition 102. Both sexes voted for marriage (57% of men and 55% of women); Latinos and whites were equally supportive (at 55% apiece); and even the generational gap was slight (49% of 18-24-year-olds voted to preserve marriage, compared to 55-57% among 30-64-year-olds). Down in Florida, where Amendment 2 rocketed past the 60% approval it needed, males and females were again equally supportive (63% of men and 62% of women) and, in California-like fashion, the support of Latinos (64%) and blacks pushed the ban (71%) over the top. Even Florida Republicans (83%), Democrats (47%), and Independents (56%) combined their support to prove that marriage is a non-partisan issue. In the state where marriage needed them most, even a majority of young people voted to protect marriage (52% of 18-24-year-olds), providing the backing the amendment needed to pass.

Additional Resources
Gay Marriage Ban Protesters, Police Clash in California Streets

8 Responses

  1. UPDATE:

    Left Protests the Church’s Winning Ways
    Members of the radical “No on 8″ campaign in California have quickly turned their disappointment over the homosexual marriage ban into rabid hostility. Protestors have flooded the streets in Los Angeles with their sights set on the Mormon Church, railing against its leaders for their powerful role in protecting marriage. Together with allies in the Catholic and Protestant churches, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) was one of the main ingredients in Proposition 8’s success. The Mormon Church’s donations, estimated at roughly $22 million, fueled the hundreds of ad placements across the state that ultimately tipped the scales in the amendment’s favor. Yesterday, 2,000 homosexual activists vilified the church, huddling outside the gate of an L.A. temple with profane signs and rainbow flags. Today, another march is scheduled for Temple Square in Salt Lake City, but the Church’s leadership has no regrets about its involvement. In a statement, Elder Clayton said, “We believe it’s a moral issue, and we reserve the right to speak out on moral issues.” At LDS headquarters in Utah, leaders called for a ceasefire with gay activists and “goodwill” on both sides. Unfortunately, that message has yet to stick with the “No on 8″ crowd, which has lashed out with unprecedented aggression against the faith community. Apart from the attacks on the LDS church (including ugly ads that depict Mormon missionaries invading the home of a lesbian couple and tearing up their marriage certificate), churches like Jack Hibbs’ Calvary Chapel at Chino Hills have been spray-painted, cars vandalized, and police have confirmed at least two reports of physical assault. Once again, the Left is proving its unwillingness to practice the very “tolerance” they preach. FRC is proud of the example that the interfaith community has set on marriage. If the Prop 8 outcome is any indication, homosexuals could stand to learn a thing or two from the church on civility.

  2. It is strange how the homosexual activists preach peace and unity and accuse us (Christians) of being almost militant in our opposition. However, when things like Proposition 8 (California) and Act 1 (Arkansas) they will do exactly what this article says they did. Sounds like spoiled children who need to practice what THEY preach!

  3. Oh the tolerance Jeff. You know that “tolerance” only goes one way with them.

    tr

  4. Elderly Prop. 8 supporter roughed up, filing charges
    http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=319132

    Radical homosexuals plan day of ‘intolerance’
    http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=319266

    Florida Family Association notes the irony in that the homosexual movement that formerly preached diversity and tolerance has now become increasingly disorderly and aggressive, even intolerant, of supporters of traditional marriage by vandalizing property and staging protests at and inside churches. Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel says the demonstrations ought to be taken seriously, especially this Saturday.

  5. Here is some more love for you:

    Church lady meet same-sex ‘marriage’ protesters
    http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details.asp?ID=26502

  6. Homosexual activists accused of ‘domestic terrorism’
    http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=321402

    tr

    P.S. Never thought I’d find myself defending the Mormon church, but it seems are on the same side of this issue!

  7. Prop. 8 opponents show ‘intolerance’, ‘hypocrisy’
    http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=325322

  8. Update:

    It’s been a full two months since voters banned same-sex “marriage” in California, but there seems to be no end in sight to the violence leveled at Prop 8 supporters. Gay and lesbian groups continue to target churches and businesses that donated to the marriage movement. This ongoing persecution is the subject of a new lawsuit by ProtectMarriage.com and the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF). To keep its supporters safe, the groups have banded to challenge California’s campaign finance laws, which compel the state to publicize the names of those who contribute more than $100 to a political campaign. ADF argues that the Political Reform Act violates the right to privacy and subjects voters to “acts of vengeance.” At the very least, attorneys believe the state should abolish the post-election reporting requirement, which makes the information available to the public even after the last ballot has been cast. There is some precedent for protecting donors. Back in 1982 the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the Socialist Workers Party, which asked to withhold contributors’ names because of past harassment. FRC will be closely monitoring the suit and will update you as the case unfolds.

Leave a Reply